Sunday, June 11, 2017

Relectioneering

What i think we should do from now on as far as electing presidents goes.

We make a reality show out of it.

Get three candidates, one representing each party.

Each candidate gets a one month trial run, with full control as president. They get to write out their plans and pick their staff, and have everything ready for their month.

Whatever things you're able to change, whatever funding or contributions are sent into your campaign box, whether digitally or physically, and however happy you make the country, both the party you represent, and the others, digitally track and count how many votes you get at the end, and see more publicly who wins.

Voters can either lock in an early vote, or have a "leaning choice", or even a "sway choice", or just wait till the very end to vote, but to count as an official vote, you need to identify yourself in some way that's verified publicly. Like video or something.

A leaning choice means you've most likely made your choice, but still observing the race, thinking you might lean another way from the performances.

A sway choice is more like standing individually, rather than leaning toward one candidate. You've made much less of a choice, and you're waiting to see the performances. Meaning, depending on how the race goes, you could sway one way or another. But as far as a starting choice to empower your political party, you can stand with your group, i.e. affiliate yourself with your party, but not the candidate.

The screens during the show, display all the information, results, and voters, as well as statistics, graphs, and live updates on their campaign achievements. If problems are being fixed locally, and the people in your country are happy, that's one category of success. If you're not causing chaos and destruction around the world, that's success in another category. If chaos and destruction are happening in your country because of people from elsewhere, and you're defending us like a videogame superhero, that's success in a third category.

Your goal locally, is to keep us safe, happy, equal enough to keep tantrums to a minimum, and educated.

As far as negativity goes locally, you need to figure out what people are pissed off about, why they're choosing to behave that way, what's causing this reaction, which isn't hard to do in a month if you make all the people in the jails and legal system do their jobs like it's a contest. You figure out what the cause of the negativity is, and you make your best attempt to to improve it.

You shouldn't base more relevance on a voter's choice because of financial status, or anything else really, but if you do, it should really only be their intellectual value.

You shouldn't base more relevance on a candidate's performance because of financial status, or anything else, except the success of how happy the majority of your country is. If everyone is fed, educated, smiling, satisfied, satiated, and not complaining... You win.

But the graphs... You cannot let one of the categories lack. You can't have rich stupid people.

Education is just as important as economic balance, and both of them are just as important as nutrition and all other factors leading to overall individual and collective happiness. If someone's personal goals in life are to hate people, walk around naked, and beg for food, let them be. However, if that same person is physically harming anyone or stealing, or being completely insane and hateful while inhabiting a political position, or shit that affects others badly... Make better decisions!

There is a massive universe of difference between a rich white guy shooting a poor person, and a poor black dude shooting a rich white lady. Just like there's an equally massive universe of difference between a grown woman seeing a naked man in public and calling the cops on that crime, and naked feminists being seen as art, and a rich rapist that gets away with his crimes because he knows people, and inherently bad people physically harming disabled people... Do you see what i'm saying there? Crimes that physically harm people are drastically different from crimes involving nudity. Nudity is not a crime. Dragging your pants on the ground should be. Around your ankles around your knees, either pull them up or take them off. It's bad enough i have to hear your music constantly.

No comments: